xerox_xerox2000 at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Apr 1 12:03:33 CDT 2010
> > The compatibility information basically indicates that Mono can substitute
> > for .NET below version 3.0. 3.0 and higher still needs Microsoft's
> > implementation.
> > How would you handle hybridizing Mono with Microsoft's framework?
> You would need different wine prefixes if you want to use both at once.
> What is the problem with 3.0, and can't it be fixed?
AFAIK mono doesn't implement WPF, so any .NET app that uses it is likely to
fail in mono. Correct me if i'm wrong
Vincent Povirk <madewokherd+8cd9 <at> gmail.com> writes:
More information about the wine-devel