wineserver: Fix French manpage

[Frédéric Delanoy]

2010/4/9 Nicolas Le Cam <niko.lecam at gmail.com>:
> Le 9 avril 2010 13:30, Frédéric Delanoy <frederic.delanoy at gmail.com> a écrit :
>> 2010/4/9 Nicolas Le Cam <niko.lecam at gmail.com>:
>>> Hi Frédéric,
>>>
>>>>+processus clients se sont terminés. Ceci évite le coût inhérent à l'arrêt
>>> sont -> soient
>>>
>>>>+\fIwineserver\fR dans le chemin système ou quelques autres emplacements vraisemblables.
>>> "potentiels" or "possibles" suit better.
>>>
>>
>> My understanding was that it looked first in the system path, then
>> tried in, e.g., the home dir or other
>> directories.
>> I guess it looks in a hardcoded list of dirs, or sthg like that. In
>> that sense, "possibles" does not fit IMO.
>> "potentiels" or "vraisemblables" could both fit, but I wanted to
>> insist on the probability for the command
>> to be there (sthg like P[potentiels] < P[vraisemblables]).
>>
>> Frédéric
>>
> It tries PATH and BINDIR (and server/wineserver if in a build
> directory). See
> http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=blob;f=libs/wine/config.c#l480
> So 'potentiels' or 'possibles' fit better IMHO.

"Probables" may possibly fit even better (altough "potentiels" should be OK)?

Frédéric