d3d9: add a few tests for GetAdapterDisplayModeEx
Louis Lenders
xerox_xerox2000 at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Jul 7 17:14:05 CDT 2010
On 7 July 2010 23:39, Louis Lenders <xerox_xerox2000 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> + todo_wine ok(mode_ex.ScanLineOrdering == D3DSCANLINEORDERING_PROGRESSIVE,
>"ScanLineOrdering is %d instead of %d\n", mode_ex.ScanLineOrdering,
>D3DSCANLINEORDERING_PROGRESSIVE);
> + todo_wine ok(rotation == D3DDISPLAYROTATION_IDENTITY, "rotation is %d
>instead of %d\n", rotation, D3DDISPLAYROTATION_IDENTITY);
>These obviously depend on the actual setup of the machine running the
>test.
yeah, you have a suggestion how to change the test, or should i just leave
them out of the test?
>It also seems likely that you're supposed to initialize
>mode_ex.Size before making the GetAdapterDisplayModeEx() call.
I did that in the test: test shows that it fails if mode_ex.Size is null,
when it is set to sizeof(D3DDISPLAYMODEEX) it returns D3D_OK
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list