Any more infos about the build failure for my (small) patch

[Austin English]

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:50 AM, James Mckenzie
<jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Octavian Voicu wrote:
>>On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Uwe Bonnes
>><bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
>>>    Paul> SSL_CTX *SSL_CTX_new(SSL_METHOD *meth); 61557 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 root
>>>    Paul> root 87238 Jun 2 11:11 ./usr/include/openssl/ssl.h
>>>
>>> Ah, Readhat defining in it's own way.
>>> What about debian?
>>>
>>> Isn't the OpenSSL documentation way th way it should be?
>>
>>Ubuntu also has /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h.
>>Linux manpages show the same thing: http://linux.die.net/man/3/ssl_ctx_new
>>
>>Maybe this should go in autoconf?
>>
> Have to check the effect on other UNIX variations, including MacOSX before doing this.
>
> Looks like a good idea, however.

FWIW, NetBSD has the same problem as Fedora, see
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18165

-- 
-Austin