[PATCH 1/2] user32: Fix return value of EDIT_EM_Scroll.

[Alexandre Julliard]

David Hedberg <david.hedberg at gmail.com> writes:

> +static void test_edit_control_scroll(void)
> +{
> +    static const char *single_line_str = "a";
> +    HWND hwEdit;
> +    LONG ret;
> +
> +    /* Check the return value when EM_SCROLL doesn't actually scroll
> +     * anything. Should not return true if 0 lines were scrolled. */
> +    hwEdit = CreateWindow(
> +              "EDIT",
> +              single_line_str,
> +              WS_VSCROLL | ES_MULTILINE,
> +              1, 1, 100, 100,
> +              NULL, NULL, hinst, NULL);
> +
> +    assert(hwEdit);
> +
> +    ret = SendMessage(hwEdit, EM_SCROLL, SB_PAGEDOWN, 0);
> +    if(LOWORD(ret))
> +        skip("Scrolled lines not 0.\n");
> +    else
> +        ok(!ret, "Returned %x, expected 0\n", ret);
> +
> +    ret = SendMessage(hwEdit, EM_SCROLL, SB_PAGEUP, 0);
> +    if(LOWORD(ret))
> +        skip("Scrolled lines not 0.\n");
> +    else
> +        ok(!ret, "Returned %x, expected 0\n", ret);
> +
> +    ret = SendMessage(hwEdit, EM_SCROLL, SB_LINEUP, 0);
> +    if(LOWORD(ret))
> +        skip("Scrolled lines not 0.\n");
> +    else
> +        ok(!ret, "Returned %x, expected 0\n", ret);
> +
> +    ret = SendMessage(hwEdit, EM_SCROLL, SB_LINEDOWN, 0);
> +    if(LOWORD(ret))
> +        skip("Scrolled lines not 0.\n");
> +    else
> +        ok(!ret, "Returned %x, expected 0\n", ret);

The skips aren't right. If you expect some other values they should be
handled directly in the ok() check.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org