GSoC WPKG and test.winehq.org

Seth Shelnutt shelnutt2 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 7 20:09:44 CST 2010


Alright, after reviewing everything, I think that tying appinstall into
test.winehq.org along with adding more (if not most) of the wpkg scripts to
appinstall would be most beneficial in terms of conformance and regression
testing. Converting the wpkg scripts to appinstall doesn't seem like that
difficult of a task, mostly just time consuming. That is why I thinking
working on tying it into test.winehq.org is more worthy. I still think tying
appinstall and patchwatcher together would be beneficial and allow people
submitting patches to see where regressions pop up in software, and to see
what new software works with each submitted patch. Perhaps a project of
implementing all of this and adding wpkg scripts would be accepted?

A little bit of background on myself, I am currently attending the
University of Florida, seeking my undergraduate in mathematics. I've been an
active linux user for several years. I've used wine for about as long. I
have experience with writing the CUDA wrapper for wine, which is used mostly
for folding at home. (Small fah plug, Folding at home is run by stanford to
fold proteins and see how and why they fold or miss fold.  For more info see
http://folding.stanford.edu/ or
http://www.overclockers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=21).


Thanks,

Seth Shelnutt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20100308/6df368cd/attachment.htm>


More information about the wine-devel mailing list