Documentation?

[Luke Benstead]

On 14 March 2010 10:03, Roderick Colenbrander <thunderbird2k at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Scott Ritchie <scott at open-vote.org> wrote:
>> On 03/12/2010 11:01 AM, André Hentschel wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>> As we are getting somehow closer to Wine 1.2 i wonder how important
>>> updates on the Documentation are.
>>> Further i am confused about sending patches, should they just change the
>>> git-repo "docs" or the pages on the website or both?
>>>
>>
>> The website pages are supposed to be automatically generated from the docs
>> every release.  So patch the docs themselves.
>>
>> Not sure if this process still works though.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Scott Ritchie
>>
>
> I thought the plans were to attempt to move all documentation (in an
> updated form) to the Wiki. We would then need some mechanism to create
> documentation out of the wiki. Myself I rather update the wiki when I
> encounter an issue than that I update the old docs.
>
> Roderick
>
>
>

While on the subject of documentation... would it be a good idea to
begin documenting functions with something like Doxygen or similar?
I'm just wondering if we could be building our own, much more
accurate, MSDN. Is there a reason that Wine isn't documented in this
way?

Luke.