kazade at gmail.com
Sun Mar 14 05:45:44 CDT 2010
On 14 March 2010 10:03, Roderick Colenbrander <thunderbird2k at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Scott Ritchie <scott at open-vote.org> wrote:
>> On 03/12/2010 11:01 AM, André Hentschel wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>> As we are getting somehow closer to Wine 1.2 i wonder how important
>>> updates on the Documentation are.
>>> Further i am confused about sending patches, should they just change the
>>> git-repo "docs" or the pages on the website or both?
>> The website pages are supposed to be automatically generated from the docs
>> every release. So patch the docs themselves.
>> Not sure if this process still works though.
>> Scott Ritchie
> I thought the plans were to attempt to move all documentation (in an
> updated form) to the Wiki. We would then need some mechanism to create
> documentation out of the wiki. Myself I rather update the wiki when I
> encounter an issue than that I update the old docs.
While on the subject of documentation... would it be a good idea to
begin documenting functions with something like Doxygen or similar?
I'm just wondering if we could be building our own, much more
accurate, MSDN. Is there a reason that Wine isn't documented in this
More information about the wine-devel