msi: Avoid a potential NULL pointer dereference (coccicheck).
hans at codeweavers.com
Thu May 20 05:04:31 CDT 2010
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 10:03 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> >> The main reason I'm asking is because we have several of these lingering
> >> around (and marked as 'FALSE' in Coverity).
> > In this particular case we should just get rid of the goto.
> But is it a (potential) issue? I guess not. If it's not an issue wee can
> leave the code as is, not?
It's a header construction where you typically exploit the fact that the
header and extended structure start at the same address. So yes, we
could leave the code as is.
More information about the wine-devel