make "bisected" a keyword in bugzilla?

[Sven Baars]

Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Maarten Lankhorst<m.b.lankhorst at gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>    
>> On 23-05-10 01:57, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>      
>>> I think it's a good idea.  'regression' isn't as strong as 'bisected'.
>>>
>>> Unless there are objections, I'll add the keyword on Monday.
>>>
>>>        
>> I think I'll object. I don't see any point in the bisected tag that
>> regression doesn't already cover. As far as I know as soon as you tag
>> something as regression you either already have bisected it, or will be
>> asked to bisect it quickly after adding the regression tag.
>>      
> Exactly. There shouldn't be not bisected bugs with the 'regression' keyword
> in the first place.
>
>    
Exactly. And to make it easier for people to find bugs that do have the 
regression keyword, but were not bisected, you could add the bisected 
keyword, so it'd be easier to actually get to the point where all 
regressions are bisected. In this case, it is not something developers 
would use directly, but something that would at least make the work of 
developers little easier.