make "bisected" a keyword in bugzilla?

[Austin English]

On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov
<dmitry at codeweavers.com> wrote:
> Henri Verbeet <hverbeet at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ideally all regressions would be bisected, but that's clearly not the
>> case. You can of course argue about terminology and / or mechanism,
>> but I think it's useful to distinguish "possible" regressions from
>> confirmed regressions with a commit id. Personally I think it would be
>> nice if bugzilla could give me a list of commit id's and associated
>> bugs, so I could use git and some scripting to do additional
>> processing on that.
>
> Probably it would be better to add a field for commit id that caused
> a regression just like there is one for url/keywords instead of inventing
> new keywords. So a 'regression' with a commit id would automatically mean
> 'bisected'. That would also save time of finding the commit id by looking
> at every comment in the bug, and possibly avoiding finding incorrect
> bisect results.

If editing Bugzilla's layout is easy to do, I like this option.

-- 
-Austin