kernel32/tests: remove win9x hacks

[Max TenEyck Woodbury]

On 02/23/2011 09:23 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
> On 2/23/11 2:38 AM, Austin English wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:32, Paul Vriens<paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On 02/23/2011 10:15 AM, Austin English wrote:
>>>> SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);
>>>> ret = GetFullPathNameW(NULL, 0, NULL, NULL);
>>> I think you can get rid of the above two as well as they are merely
>>> used to
>>> trigger the ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED.
>>>
>>>> - is_win9x = !ret&& GetLastError() == ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED;
>>>> -
>>>> - if (is_win9x)
>>>> - win_skip("Skipping some tests that cause GetFullPathNameA to
>>>> crash on Win9x\n");
>> Good catch, will resend, thanks.
>>
> Austin:
>
> I thought the consensus was to leave the is_win9x hacks in place so that
> folks will not break Windows98 when testing. However, there are going to
> be no new tests for Windows9x/ME and that all tests were to assume that
> we have or are using WindowsNT4 or higher.
>
> Did I miss something while I was away collecting my thoughts?
>
> James McKenzie
>
>
>
That was my understanding as well.

Max