[PATCH 1/3] winemenubuilder: Icon heights/widths of 0 mean 256, for Vista icons.

[Damjan Jovanovic]

The 256x256 pixel icons are designed to be viewed in that size. They
can, and often do, contain a different picture to the smaller icons.
When you scale them down to a smaller size, they look bad. On MacOS
that may not matter since multiple icon sizes are written and the best
is chosen, but on freedesktops we only write 1 icon size at the
moment, and then it gets scaled to something like 64x64, so it really
does make a difference.

Install eMule and see its icons on Gnome as an example.

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Ken Thomases <ken at codeweavers.com> wrote:
>
> The existing code would always prefer a smaller icon because it was
> misinterpreting 256x256 icons as 0x0.
> ---
> programs/winemenubuilder/winemenubuilder.c |   32 +++++++++++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
>
>
>
>