New winetricks 20110117-alpha: new verbs dxdiag, firefox4, ut3, hegemonygold_demo, dxdiagn, pngfilt; new svn repo, download url
Scott Ritchie
scott at open-vote.org
Tue Jan 18 19:39:25 CST 2011
- Previous message: New winetricks 20110117-alpha: new verbs dxdiag, firefox4, ut3, hegemonygold_demo, dxdiagn, pngfilt; new svn repo, download url
- Next message: Winetricks game verbs - good or bad? (was: Re: New winetricks 20110117-alpha: new verbs dxdiag, firefox4, ut3, hegemonygold_demo, ...)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On 01/17/2011 03:14 PM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:33:28 -0700
> Vitaliy Margolen <wine-devel at kievinfo.com> wrote:
>
>> Isn't that exactly why we marked all other scripts like this a "third party
>> unsupported tools"? If you moving the same direction, then winetricks will
>> fall into the same category - if you using it, ask Dan, don't bother asking
>> people on forum, filing bugs, etc.
>>
>
> We already treat winetricks like that. I know I'm constantly telling users to reinstall to a clean wineprefix with no winetricks. The winetricks wiki page tells users explicitly not to report bugs here if they have used winetricks to install native dlls, and has a link to winezeug to report bugs in winetricks itself. I don't see any of that changing.
>
> That said, I do think winetricks has become bloated. JMHO.
>
Bloat is really just an interface problem. It's still only a few
kilobytes of shell script.
-Scott
- Previous message: New winetricks 20110117-alpha: new verbs dxdiag, firefox4, ut3, hegemonygold_demo, dxdiagn, pngfilt; new svn repo, download url
- Next message: Winetricks game verbs - good or bad? (was: Re: New winetricks 20110117-alpha: new verbs dxdiag, firefox4, ut3, hegemonygold_demo, ...)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list