Updated Clang static analysis results / Valgrind update

[Vincas Miliūnas]

> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 04:15, Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com <http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-devel>> wrote:
> >/ Web space usage was getting a bit high, so I've uploaded a tarball to
> />/ a file download service:
> />/ http://www.sendspace.com/file/5hot36
> />/
> />/ austin at aw21 <http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-devel> ~ $ sha1sum scan-build-2011-07-02.tar.bz2
> />/ ac3cb3920ef97641fff1f5376f8136cef01f15bf  scan-build-2011-07-02.tar.bz2
> /
> FWIW, you could use xz instead of bzip2 to further reduce the download
> size (54 MiB)
> I got the size down to 46 MiB using default settings, and 25 MiB using
> max compression (xz -9)
>
> Frédéric
I have heard about he xz compressor, so I was interested on how 7zip and xz perform maxed-out:

7z a -t7z -m0=lzma -mx=9 -mfb=255 -md=256m -ms=on scan-build-2011-07-02-1.7z scan-build-2011-07-02-1
11.87MiB - 12445530 scan-build-2011-07-02-1.7z

xz -zkc -Fxz -9e -M5GB --lzma2='dict=256Mi,nice=273,mf=bt4' scan-build-2011-07-02-1.tar > scan-build-2011-07-02-1.xz
12.14MiB - 12726004 scan-build-2011-07-02-1.xz

I didn't measure time, but it wasn't very long; xz took longer, because it doesn't support multithreading. Both required 3.5GB of memory at the peek.