d3dx9_36: Push down the scope of two variables. (RESEND)

[Tony Wasserka]

Am 05.07.2011 20:33, schrieb Gerald Pfeifer:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>>> This does not fix a bug or add a feature, but it makes the coder easier
>>> to follow.  Narrower scope tends to be a good thing for variables, both
>>> for human readers and compilers (though modern ones should not need the
>>> hint).
>> Not necessarily, that's a matter of taste (IOW, not something you should
>> "fix" in other people's code).
> The reason I came up with this patch is that trying to debug something
> I got lost a bit, and reducing the scope of these variables really helped
> make things easier to follow.
>
>
> When you are referring to "other people's code", according to git log
> Tony has been the primary contributor, so that would be his call then?
>
> Tony, this is
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2011-July/103866.html
> -- what's your take?
>
> Gerald
I doubt this change is critical enough to justify any need for the 
original author's opinion :P

I personally prefer narrow scope as well usually... if you want to 
change it, sure, I'm unlikely to touch that code ever again anyway..

Best regards,
Tony