wine bug 27600

Matijn Woudt tijnema at gmail.com
Thu Jun 30 09:55:46 CDT 2011


On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/6/30  <wylda at volny.cz>:
>>> Ok, try with a modified header:
>>>
>>
>> OK no problem, i will try later today. But i don't think it's a bug
>> in applicability of those patches. I began with wine testing 2 years
>> ago and did many regression tests, reverse reg.testing, found faulty
>> commit even though it was covered by several other faulty commits
>> etc.
>>
>> I think I can find a problem between patches quite well. I can't go
>> under "patch level" aka go into lines of code and that's the helping
>> hand i would need here, i.e. i know, that 3rd patch of your series
>> makes troubles to me and i also know, that your one big merged and
>> modified patch works for me. Unfortunately as i said, i can't search
>> a regression between lines of code. And this is a place we should
>> look in, i guess...
>>
>> Sure, i will try again your modified script later today and let you
>> know.
>>
>> For the other guys, could i call for help?? Could you please try to
>> apply the Vincas's 9 patch raw-input series to the current git, try
>> to compile and let me know, if you succeed? I really would like to
>> know if i'm the only one with such problem.
>>
>> Thank you all,
>> W.
>
> $ cd wine-git
> $ wget http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6901628/raw.patch
> $ patch -p1 < raw.patch
> $ ./tools/make_requests
> $ ./configure
> $ make
>
> works here:
> austin at debian:~/wine-git$ cat /etc/issue
> Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid \n \l
>
> austin at debian:~/wine-git$ uname -a
> Linux debian 2.6.39-2-686-pae #1 SMP Wed Jun 8 11:33:14 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> --
> -Austin

Wylda already reported that this big patch worked, but the 9-patch
series didn't. Can you try those?



More information about the wine-devel mailing list