dinput: Stub IDirectInputJoyConfig8 interface.

[Michael Stefaniuc]

On 11/24/2011 08:46 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> On 11/24/2011 12:27 PM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>> Hello Vitaliy,
>>
>> On 11/24/2011 06:28 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>>> ---
>>>   dlls/dinput/dinput_main.c    |    7 ++
>>>   dlls/dinput/dinput_private.h |    2 +
>>>   dlls/dinput/joystick.c       |  195 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   include/dinputd.h            |  243
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   4 files changed, 447 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>   create mode 100644 include/dinputd.h
>>
>> we are trying to get rid off the LPJUNK,
>> IDirectInputJoyConfig8 * is so much more nicer than
>> LPDIRECTINPUTJOYCONFIG8.
> IMHO - it's not. And it deviates from the PSDK headers, and the rest of
> the dinput. Not even saying that headers won't match declaration.
I'm not talking about changing the headers but about the COM methods
implementation. In addition to the usual complains about the LPJUNK
typedefs in the case of COM interfaces there is also a loss of
information as LPJUNK normally translates to JUNK*.

bye
	michael