Marking test cases as flaky?

[Stefan Dösinger]

On Saturday 10 September 2011 21:56:26 Dan Kegel wrote:
> Might want to define the new form as ok2_ or something
> so we can defer changing the explicit uses of ok_().
I dislike the idea, it has the feeling of legacy cruft. Either way it is a 
fairly minor point - the main change that needs debating is whether we should 
print the function name or not.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20110911/2733d88d/attachment.pgp>