Changed UrlGetPartA and UrlGetPartW to return the correct (different) values.

[Nikolay Sivov]

On 3/21/2012 09:24, Eric Culp wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead at gmail.com 
> <mailto:bunglehead at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 3/21/2012 08:58, Eric Culp wrote:
>
>         The two functions have different return values on windows for
>         analogous inputs.
>         Changed to match windows behavior.
>         ---
>          dlls/shlwapi/url.c |   12 ++++++++++--
>          1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>     Please add some tests for that.
>
> I think it's already covered by
>
> dlls/shlwapi/tests/url.c:672
> res = pUrlGetPartA("hi", szPart, &dwSize, URL_PART_SCHEME, 0);
> ok (res==S_FALSE, "UrlGetPartA(\"hi\") returned %08X\n", res);
>
> and
>
> dlls/shlwapi/tests/url.c:685
> res = pUrlGetPartW(hiW, bufW, &dwSize, URL_PART_SCHEME, 0);
> todo_wine ok(res==S_OK, "UrlGetPartW(\"hi\") returned %08X\n", res);
>
> Line 686 was the one that previously triggered a todo. Should the 
> todo_wine be removed?
Yes, you should run 'make test' and get no errors after your changes. If 
you fixed todo it should be removed, if you break existing test you 
should fix your patch.
>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20120321/19a913c7/attachment.html>