iphlpapi: Let C look like C.

Michael Stefaniuc mstefani at redhat.com
Thu Feb 7 03:09:02 CST 2013


Thanks Juan,

On 02/07/2013 12:54 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
> Hi Michael, this isn't actually a problem with your patch, just
> something I spotted:
> 
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani at redhat.com
> <mailto:mstefani at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 02/06/2013 11:16 PM, Austin English wrote:
>     > On Feb 6, 2013 11:13 PM, "Michael Stefaniuc" <mstefani at redhat.de
>     <mailto:mstefani at redhat.de>
>     > <mailto:mstefani at redhat.de <mailto:mstefani at redhat.de>>> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> ---
>     >>  dlls/iphlpapi/ipstats.c |    2 +-
>     >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>     >>
>     >> diff --git a/dlls/iphlpapi/ipstats.c b/dlls/iphlpapi/ipstats.c
>     >> index f8191ba..966d24e 100644
>     >> --- a/dlls/iphlpapi/ipstats.c
>     >> +++ b/dlls/iphlpapi/ipstats.c
>     >> @@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ DWORD WINAPI GetIcmpStatisticsEx(PMIB_ICMP_EX
>     > stats, DWORD family)
>     >>      }
>     >>
>     >>      ret = GetIcmpStatistics(&ipv4stats);
>     >> -    if SUCCEEDED(ret)
>     >> +    if (SUCCEEDED(ret))
> 
> 
> This code is incorrect. All paths that set ret yield a non-negative
> value for ret, so SUCCEEDED(ret) is always 1. Using SUCCEEDED/FAILED on
> something other than an HRESULT is asking for trouble. The correct thing
> to do is if (!ret).
can you please submit the patch so you get the commit glory?

thanks
bye
	michael



More information about the wine-devel mailing list