[1/3] widl: Pass type attributes from write_array_tfs to write_pointer_description. Take 2.

[Nikolay Sivov]

On 3/21/2014 11:09, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> This allows to differentiate strings and write appropriate rpc type
> (FC_C_C[W]STRING instead of FC_[W]CHAR).
>
> This version of the patch limits write_array_tfs() to pass attributes
> to write_pointer_description() only for strings and avoids unwanted
> changes to other pointer types.
> ---
>   tools/widl/typegen.c | 8 ++++----
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/widl/typegen.c b/tools/widl/typegen.c
> index 37d18f5..889d8c5 100644
> --- a/tools/widl/typegen.c
> +++ b/tools/widl/typegen.c
> @@ -2728,7 +2728,7 @@ static int write_varying_array_pointer_descriptions(
>       return pointer_count;
>   }
>   
> -static void write_pointer_description(FILE *file, type_t *type,
> +static void write_pointer_description(FILE *file, const attr_list_t *attrs, type_t *type,
>                                         unsigned int *typestring_offset)
>   {
>       unsigned int offset_in_buffer;
> @@ -2757,7 +2757,7 @@ static void write_pointer_description(FILE *file, type_t *type,
>       if (is_conformant_array(type) &&
>           (type_array_is_decl_as_ptr(type) || !current_structure))
>           write_conformant_array_pointer_descriptions(
> -            file, NULL, type, 0, typestring_offset);
> +            file, attrs, type, 0, typestring_offset);
>       else if (type_get_type(type) == TYPE_STRUCT &&
>                get_struct_fc(type) == RPC_FC_CPSTRUCT)
>       {
> @@ -2962,7 +2962,7 @@ static unsigned int write_array_tfs(FILE *file, const attr_list_t *attrs, type_t
>               print_file(file, 2, "0x%x,\t/* FC_PP */\n", RPC_FC_PP);
>               print_file(file, 2, "0x%x,\t/* FC_PAD */\n", RPC_FC_PAD);
>               *typestring_offset += 2;
> -            write_pointer_description(file, type, typestring_offset);
> +            write_pointer_description(file, is_string_type(attrs, type) ? attrs : NULL, type, typestring_offset);
I think it'd be cleaner to let write_pointer_description() handle that, 
as now you pass all needed info in anyway.