TestBot job 37466 results: [PATCH 2/7] schedsvc/tests: Add ATSvc RPC API tests.

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

Francois Gouget <fgouget at codeweavers.com> wrote:

> > Marvin <testbot at winehq.org> wrote:
> > 
> > configure: OpenCL 64-bit development files not found, OpenCL won't be supported.
> [...]
> > configure: libldap (OpenLDAP) 64-bit development files not found, LDAP won't be supported.
> > 
> > configure: WARNING: gettext tools not found (or too old), translations won't be built.
> > configure: WARNING: libxml2 64-bit development files not found (or too old), XML won't be supported.
> > configure: WARNING: libxslt 64-bit development files not found, xslt won't be supported.
> > configure: WARNING: libgnutls 64-bit development files not found, no schannel support.
> > configure: WARNING: libjpeg 64-bit development files not found, JPEG won't be supported.
> > configure: WARNING: libpng 64-bit development files not found, PNG won't be supported.
> > configure: WARNING: No sound system was found. Windows applications will be silent.
> > configure: Finished.  Do 'make' to compile Wine.
> > 
> > Could this configure checks be satisfied? It seems suboptimal that
> > a Wine testbot is missing a lot of optional components a test may
> > depend upon and try to exercise.
> 
> These don't matter since the build VM is only used to generate PE32 
> executables which don't use the native Linux libraries.
> 
> More precisely the build VM has three Wine checkouts:
> * One where used to build Wine's build tools such as wrc. This is the 
>   checkout that generates the above warnings. But this checkout is not 
>   actually used to build any Wine dll or executable.
> * One which uses MinGW to build 32 bit Windows executables.
> * One which uses MinGW to build 64 bit Windows executables.
> 
> The latter two are the ones that matter but they don't need the native 
> Linux libraries.

Thanks for the explanation, I had an impression that testbot is also
supposed to create builds for Linux runs, is that a different VM?

-- 
Dmitry.