[PATCH] ws2_32: Trace status on operation failure.

[Paul Gofman]

On 2/9/22 20:12, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> On 2/9/22 11:10, Paul Gofman wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gofman <pgofman at codeweavers.com>
>> ---
>>       Supersedes 226140.
>>
>>       v2:
>>            - use TRACE instead of WARN.
>>
>>   dlls/ws2_32/socket.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> If we're going to just TRACE always, is there any point in guarding it 
> to only print on failure?
>
Probably not.