<div>Hi </div>
<div> Thank you</div>
<div> Our processor is a 64 bit processor. </div>
<div> I need to check for the Dual Core or not ? </div>
<div> </div>
<div> BTW, if possible , can you please send the URL for the other thread that gives the information about the slower performance in Dual Core machine</div>
<div> </div>
<div> Right now, I have RHEL 4.0 in all Xeon processors. I need to install Windows OS on it , to verify for any issues with RHEL with wine on Xeon processor. I will try to that in this weekend</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thank you </div>
<div>Regards</div>
<div>Ajay<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/10/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Coleman Kane</b> <<a href="mailto:ckane@intellitree.com">ckane@intellitree.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 10:51 -0600, Tom Spear (Dustin Booker, Dustin<br>Navea) wrote:<br>> Hi, sorry I didnt reply all so it would go to the wine list.
<br>><br>> Is your Xeon a dual core, or possibly even 64-bit? I doubt that 64-bit<br>> compared to 32-bit would make a difference, but if the Xeon is a dc, it<br>> might, as I recall another thread here saying that they were having
<br>> problems with a dual core system being slower.<br>><br>> The only other thing I can think of (of course I'm not that far along<br>> with my programming skill, and I doubt it will make much difference<br>
> anyway) is what kind of machine the application and the dll were<br>> compiled on. If you have the source for either of those, and have<br>> access to a xeon that is running windows (2003 server?) and can compile,
<br>> i'd suggest trying that, otherwise, I have no clue.<br>><br>> HTH<br>><br>> Tom<br>><br><br>If memory serves me right, many of the dual-core intel chips share some<br>on-chip components (such as the total cache). You'd get all of the cache
<br>lines allocated to one chip in UP, and divided among the cores in SMP.<br>There are probably other resources on the chip for which this is the<br>case... perhaps that is a source of your slowness?<br><br>--<br>coleman kane
<br><br>> Ananth M wrote:<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > On 2/10/06, *Ananth M* <<a href="mailto:mekaananth@gmail.com">mekaananth@gmail.com</a><br>> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:mekaananth@gmail.com">mekaananth@gmail.com
</a>>> wrote:<br>> ><br>> > The wine source code was compiled in the Xeon processor<br>> ><br>> > We had'nt recompiled the kernel with Xeon Processor , we are using<br>> > the same that is coming with RHEL
4.0<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Now I compiled the kernel again and used the new kernel Image.<br>> > Still I am getting the same timings<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > On 2/9/06, *Tom Spear (Dustin Booker, Dustin Navea)* <
<br>> > <a href="mailto:speeddymon@gmail.com">speeddymon@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:speeddymon@gmail.com">speeddymon@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>> ><br>> > Are the wine binaries on the Xeon server precompiled (even
<br>> > copied from<br>> > the P4 machine), or are they compiled on the Xeon server itself?<br>> ><br>> > Also, has the kernel been recompiled with explicit support for<br>> > the Xeon,
<br>> > or is it the stock kernel that comes with RHEL 4?<br>> ><br>> > Tom<br>> ><br>> > Ananth M wrote:<br>> > > Hi All<br>> > ><br>
> > > I have a windows application that calls a<br>> > function (<br>> > > approximately 10000 times) exported by a third party DLL.<br>> > > I have two machines ( one with Intel pentium 4
<br>> > > processor and<br>> > > other with Intel Xeon processor ) with RHEL 4.0 installed<br>> > on both<br>> > > of these<br>> > > machine.
<br>> > > If I execute the windows application on the first<br>> > > machine (one<br>> > > with Intel pentium 4 processor ) using WINE, the execution<br>
> > time is<br>> > > almost<br>> > > equal to the execution time in windows machine.<br>> > > But, if I execute the same application on the
<br>> > second<br>> > > machine<br>> > > (Intel Xeon processor ), the execution time is almost 6<br>> > times to<br>> > > the first<br>> > > machine.
<br>> > > I am using WINE-0.9.2 and wine is installed by<br>> > > downloading the<br>> > > wine source code from <a href="http://winehq.org">winehq.org</a>
<<a href="http://winehq.org/">http://winehq.org/</a>> <<br>> > <a href="http://winehq.org/">http://winehq.org/</a>><br>> > > Is it a known issue (or )<br>> > > Do I need to do any additional configuration
<br>> > setting to<br>> > > work with<br>> > > Intel Xeon processor ?<br>> > ><br>> > > Regards<br>> > > Ajay<br>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>><br>><br>><br><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>