So, does that mean that the wine debugger is now available in extras? Because it seems its not there, and I could find a such package that would contain it...<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/4/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">
Vitaliy Margolen</b> <<a href="mailto:wine-devel@kievinfo.com">wine-devel@kievinfo.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 12:06:00 PM, Andreas Bierfert wrote:<br>> Hi,<br><br>> some of you might have noticed that building 0.9.16 for Fedora Extras took me<br>> more time then the releases before. This was because of the discussions from a
<br>> couple of weeks ago on this list. As a result I did spent some time on the<br>> mentioned issues and came across an easy solution:<br><br>> If you install wine form the Fedora Extras repository via 'yum install wine'
<br>> nearly everything that would be in a monolithic package is going to be<br>> installed. The 'wine' package now is a meta-package containing requires for<br>> the various subpackages. So now 'normal' users who do a 'yum install wine'
<br>> will get everything they need and experts who know what they are doing can<br>> go and install only the parts they want. I hope that this solution now leads to<br>> fewer 'false positives' on bug reports and for better user integration and
<br>> satisfies some of the things you, the wine folks, brought up.<br><br>> Thanks for the input on this matter. I hope that this is only the first step<br>> towards a good relation ship between wine and the fedora packages for wine and
<br>> that emails like the ones from a couple of weeks back won't happen again...<br><br>> So for the announcement:<br><br>> wine 0.9.16 for Fedora Extras 3,4,5,devel is build and should be pushed to the<br>> mirrors in a couple of hours.
<br><br>> - Andreas<br><br><br>Wonderful! Thank you very much!<br><br>Vitaliy.<br><br><br><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>