<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7652.24">
<TITLE>Re: [1/2] gdi32: Added PolyDraw tests to tests/path.c [try2]</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>On 6/27/07, Evan Stade <estade at gmail.com> wrote:<BR>
> Hi,<BR>
><BR>
> [try2] The patch I sent yesterday was not properly todo_wined. Also,<BR>
> this test is a bit more extensive (about twice as many points drawn).<BR>
> It uses various point-type combination (even non-sensical ones such as<BR>
> PT_LINETO | PT_MOVETO) to test the exact logic of PolyDraw with an<BR>
> open path.<BR>
><BR>
> changelog:<BR>
> * added polydraw test to path testing (5 more todo_wines)<BR>
><BR>
> dlls/gdi32/tests/path.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<BR>
> 1 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)<BR>
><BR>
> --<BR>
> Evan Stade<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
Also, I'd add a PT_MOVETO into your first PolyDraw call so you can tell whether<BR>
PT_CLOSEFIGURE adds a PT_MOVETO to orig_pos or lastmove, as the current version<BR>
does not differentiate this.<BR>
<BR>
Misha</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>