Maarten why not focus on supporting applications that don't have viable open source solutions first? I can think of hundreds. <br><br>The only thing iTunes will add, with full support, is ipod syncing (that isn't useless). <br>
<br>Or should we avoid that debate? <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 18, 2008 3:18 PM, Maarten Lankhorst <<a href="mailto:m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com">m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Edward,<br><br>2008/2/17, Edward Savage <<a href="mailto:epssyis@gmail.com">epssyis@gmail.com</a>>:<br><div class="Ih2E3d">> Why are we interested in iTunes? There seem to be plenty of alternatives<br>> available.<br>
><br>> Or are we talking about ipod compatibility specifically, as there are no<br>> viable alternatives to iTunes for syncing.<br></div>Because this is a project that runs windows apps in linux, instead of<br>writing alternatives for it? ;-)<br>
<br>Cheers,<br><font color="#888888">Maarten.<br></font></blockquote></div><br>