Alright. I thought bug for bug compatibility was just for compatibility. In this case it didn't seem like it mattered, and could be implemented differently between versions.<br><br>In that case, this patch can be ignored, and my previous patch can be used that does attempt to be the same as Windows.<br>
<br>The previous patch that I am referring to is:<br>user32: Increased area for scrolling via mouse drag outside scrollbar<br><a href="http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-May/065944.html">http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-May/065944.html</a><br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 2:53 PM, James Hawkins <<a href="mailto:truiken@gmail.com">truiken@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Dylan Smith <<a href="mailto:dylan.ah.smith@gmail.com">dylan.ah.smith@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> When dragging the scrollbar thumb with the mouse, the mouse is able to<br>
> move away from the scrollbar and keep scrolling so long as it isn't too<br>
> far away from the scrollbar. This makes it easier to quickly scroll<br>
> with the mouse.<br>
><br>
> This patch is an alternative to the Windows approach of allowing the<br>
> mouse to be dragged a certain distance from the scrollbar, and instead<br>
> allows the mouse to be dragged any distance away and still scroll.<br>
> Although this is different from Windows, it shouldn't result in any<br>
> compatibility issues.<br>
><br>
> It is my personal opinion that this is a simpler and more usable<br>
> approach.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>It doesn't matter if you think it's simpler and more usable. We are<br>
bug-for-bug compatible with Windows.<br>
<br>
--<br>
<font color="#888888">James Hawkins<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>