<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
James Hawkins wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:22821af30901031512t27cc31edh20a57fdac743f44f@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Andrey Turkin <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:andrey.turkin@gmail.com"><andrey.turkin@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I _love_ this idea, and icons look very nice, but here can be some legal
troubles. The icons are under Creative Commons - Share Alike 2.5 license.
I'm not a lawyer and not sure if using (probably modified) icons would be
considered as "share alike" condition - they say "alter, transform or build
upon", but probably authors intent was that icons must stay under CC
Share-Alike license. See e.g.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/tango-artists/2006-September/000681.html">http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/tango-artists/2006-September/000681.html</a>
. These "wars" between open source licenses make me sick.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-December/071145.html">http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-December/071145.html</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
That's great! Once they switch the license we definitely should use
Tango.<br>
</body>
</html>