<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:47 PM, David Laight <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:david@l8s.co.uk">david@l8s.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 06:23:53PM -0500, King InuYasha wrote:<br>
><br>
> Unfortunately, at the moment it really is the best we have. AFAIK, there<br>
> isn't any other FOSS compiler that can build 16-bit DOS/Win16 applications.<br>
> Unless someone was actually willing to figure out how to make GCC be able to<br>
> target Win16 (not likely) or write a whole new compiler toolchain to target<br>
> Win16/DOS, there really isn't anything else left to use.<br>
<br>
</div>Will 'Bruce's C Compiler' target DOS/Win 16 ?<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
� � � �David<br>
<br>
--<br>
David Laight: <a href="mailto:david@l8s.co.uk">david@l8s.co.uk</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><div>Well, I stand corrected, Bruce's C Compiler will target DOS, but it doesn't look like it targets Win16, since it targets only DOS COM executables, not the DOS NE executable type also required (NE type is the one used in Win16 which is different from DOS COM type).</div>