Hi Hans,<br><br>Sorry for this, but my patch just contained a typo, 'Intvalue' and 'IntValue' are just strings that can be set to anything but should match. I have already sent in new patches for this, but because I am not on the mailinglist they take some time to arrive. However, these patches are already outdated, due to Austin's comments.<br>
So after my first two new patches, I have also in six more patches incorporating Austin's comment and other column types, so they will arrive soon.<br><br>Hib<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Hans Leidekker <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hans@codeweavers.com">hans@codeweavers.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
> - � � � � � �"( `Property` CHAR(255), `Value` CHAR(1) �PRIMARY KEY `Property`)" );<br>
> + � � � � � �"( `Property` CHAR(255), `Value` CHAR(1), `Intvalue` INT PRIMARY KEY `Property`)" );<br>
> � � ok( r == ERROR_SUCCESS , "Failed to create table\n" );<br>
...<br>
> � � ok( check_record( rec, 2, "Value"), "wrong record type\n");<br>
>+ � �ok( check_record( rec, 3, "IntValue"), "wrong record type\n");<br>
<br>
These changes don't agree on the case of 'Intvalue', causing this test to<br>
fail. It would be interesting to see if the remaining column types also need<br>
the extra flag.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
�-Hans<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>