<br clear="all"><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Paul Chitescu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:paulc@voip.null.ro">paulc@voip.null.ro</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On Friday 20 November 2009 05:43:48 pm Charles Davis wrote:<br>
> Paul Chitescu wrote:<br>
> > On Monday 16 November 2009 04:11:25 pm Paul Chitescu wrote:<br>
> >> Changelog:<br>
> >> Add .cvsignore entries for .fake files.<br>
> ><br>
> > What's wrong with this? Applies cleanly to my pristine wine-CVS, tried<br>
with<br>
> > patch taken from wine-patches bounce.<br>
> ><br>
> > Whoever rejected with "fails to apply" please reply with the output.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> We don't use CVS anymore. Now we use git. You need to first upgrade to<br>
> git, then modify the .gitignore file.<br>
><br>
> Chip<br>
<br>
</div></div>Obviously I use CVS and the ? ......fake status reports are a nuissance. The<br>
fact you don't care about CVS doesn't mean everybody has to switch, especially<br>
since git isn't supported as widely as CVS.<br></blockquote><div><br>What do you mean by "git isn't supported as widely as CVS"?<br><br>In any case, CVS is *ancient*. You really should learn how to use git, specially if you want to contribute to wine. It'll make your life easier, after the initial learning curve.<br>
<br>For instance, I'd hate to do regression testing using CVS, instead of a git bisect.<br><br><br>--Stephen<br><br>programmer, n:<br> A red eyed, mumbling mammal capable of conversing with inanimate monsters.</div>
</div><br>