On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Ove Kaaven <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ovek@arcticnet.no">ovek@arcticnet.no</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Sir Gallantmon skrev:<br>
<div class="im">> I don't think I have seen any distribution include wine-gecko. Fedora<br>
> seems to be in the best position to finally make a wine-gecko package,<br>
> since it now provides a MinGW toolchain.<br>
<br>
</div>Why does *that* put Fedora in the best position? Debian has had a MinGW<br>
toolchain for years, the "building wine-gecko" wiki page even mentions<br>
attempts to use it. Only problem with it is that it's not the newest<br>
version.<br>
<br>
Perhaps if you meant that Fedora also has built a whole bunch of<br>
libraries using mingw and packaged them as rpms, then that *might* give<br>
it an edge. Still won't make me ever use Fedora, though.<br>
</blockquote></div><br><div>Sorry, I think of the word "toolchain" differently I guess. I always considered a toolchain to include both tools and common libraries, as Fedora did. I was aware of the MinGW compiler offered in the Debian package repository, but with no libraries, I considered it useless.</div>