Right, sorry, didn't mean to make it seem like there was nothing in place already. Buildbot just seems more easily extensible. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Dan Kegel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dank@kegel.com">dank@kegel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Arjun Comar <<a href="mailto:mandaya@rose-hulman.edu">mandaya@rose-hulman.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
> --Buildbot--<br>
> To keep from seeming pedantic, I'll be brief with this one. Automating<br>
> testing suites are awesome and help keep down the number of bugs/regressions<br>
> that pop up. It'd be really cool if Wine had something like this.<br>
<br>
</div>To be clear, Wine *does* have something like this already, but<br>
it's kind of fragmented, and only a few people know how<br>
to run all the pieces. �The value of Buildbot might be that<br>
it's a popular system, so more people will be able to participate<br>
in running more pieces of, and adding to, our automated build & test.<br>
<font color="#888888">- Dan<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">Sorry about the confusion!<br>-- <br>Arjun Comar, Rose-Hulman '12<br>