<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/5/31 Dmitry Timoshkov <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dmitry@codeweavers.com">dmitry@codeweavers.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">Frédéric Delanoy <<a href="mailto:frederic.delanoy@gmail.com">frederic.delanoy@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> >> I'm intending to convert dlls/kernel32/nls/fr.nls from CP 1252 to CP<br>
> >> 65001 (UTF-8),<br>
> ><br>
> > Is there a ny reason behind that?<br>
><br>
> Uniformisation? Universality? All other rc files (at least Fr ones,<br>
> and most of the others) have already been<br>
> converted.<br>
<br>
</div>If that's the only reason then there is no reasion to bother. On the other<br>
hand if you are working on translating those files, or adding new translations<br>
then you are free to choose the file encoding. dlls/kernel32/nls/* files<br>
are autogenerated, so leave them alone.<br>
<br>
--<br>
<font color="#888888">Dmitry.<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>Autogenerated? From which source/using which mechanism?<br><br>If this is the case, shouldn't there be a comment in the file header that says so?<br><br>Frédéric<br>