<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 03/20/12 10:48, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAFd36Bj+GhhinefCkgXVSeqR1PqcW3KkFy0WjpW5UBCbyr8f8w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div>
<div>
<div>On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Jacek Caban <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jacek@codeweavers.com">jacek@codeweavers.com</a>></span>
wrote:</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi all,<br>
<br>
GSoC is starting this year and, if we want to have good
applications, we<br>
need to update our proposals. Usually the most attention is
directed<br>
into adding new ones, while we keep obviously bad (or just bad
IMO)<br>
proposals on the page. I'm planning to remove following
project proposals:<br>
<br>
Security - implement sandboxing<br>
Theming - Implement Wine theming support<br>
NTDLL - support performance registry keys<br>
Winelib Aware Scons (or cmake)<br>
Cleanup Winemenubuilder to support generating Application
Bundles on Mac<br>
OS X<br>
Wine-based application virtualization<br>
<br>
If someone knows a reason to not remove them, please reply.<br>
<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Jacek<br>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>Why remove theming support?</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I don't believe in success of such project for GSoC. We've already
rejected applications for this (at least one last year). I'd much
rather see students send applications for other proposals. That's
just my opinion, if others feel differently, we may keep it.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAFd36Bj+GhhinefCkgXVSeqR1PqcW3KkFy0WjpW5UBCbyr8f8w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div> It would go a long way towards excellent desktop
integration.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Agreed, but that doesn't make it a good project.<br>
<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Jacek<br>
</body>
</html>