<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/22/2013 07:08 PM, Ken Thomases
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:12CF3CF2-6F2C-4BA2-B899-822947C69830@codeweavers.com"
      type="cite">I can't speak to how Windows would render it, but one
      such font is Zapfino. It's an "exuberant" calligraphic font with
      lots of flourishes, some of which have strokes extending into the
      line above or below.
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zapfino">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zapfino</a>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.google.com/images?q=zapfino">https://www.google.com/images?q=zapfino</a>
      -Ken
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    I have never known about this font -- very stylistic indeed. :)<br>
    <br>
    While there are plenty of strokes that go well above the cap height
    or below the baseline, the Win Ascent and Win Descent values (which
    are defined as yMax for all glyphs and -yMin for all glyphs,
    respectively) in the metric tables are valid - none of the glyphs
    violate these limits, so the patch doesn't affect this
    (correctly-formatted) font.<br>
    <br>
    I loaded it up in Wine's Notepad, both with and without my patch,
    and took screenshots of the output:<br>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
      charset=ISO-8859-1">
    <a
href="http://cfsworks.com/files/images/screenshots/zapfino_wine_unpatched.png">http://cfsworks.com/files/images/screenshots/zapfino_wine_unpatched.png</a><br>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
      charset=ISO-8859-1">
    <a
href="http://cfsworks.com/files/images/screenshots/zapfino_wine_patched.png">http://cfsworks.com/files/images/screenshots/zapfino_wine_patched.png</a><br>
    <br>
    I even did a pixel-by-pixel comparison: they render the same!<br>
    <br>
    Sadly I can't make any comparisons to how Windows would handle the
    font. My Win XP VM complains about the ttf being corrupt. Is there a
    similar font that will work on Windows that I could try?<br>
    <br>
    Thanks,<br>
    Sam<br>
  </body>
</html>