<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><small>Den 30. april 2016 17:33, skrev
Nikolay Sivov:</small><br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:41ab4fd5-ed2b-6724-b5f2-20bbc268c9d9@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 30.04.2016 17:18, Kim Malmo wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I have added missing translations and fixed up the fuzzy ones. I've also
fixed some minor typos and spelling errors in the old translation.
The undertaking that might stand out here however, is I've tried to make
it more consistent with itself, and more consistent with the original
english text. One thing I want to point out is the (former) usage of
« and » signs. First of all the are no longer present on Norwegian
keyboards, second and perhaps most importantly, they look hideous with
whatever is the default Wine font. For consistency what I've done is the
following:
* For %1 (or similar) in the english text I have used %1 or '%1' depending
on context. In some cases it makes sense to wrap handles or operations
in Norwegian.
* For '%1' (or similar) in the english text I have used '%1'
* All cases of «%1» (or similar) has been changed to %1 or '%1' depending
on context.
For parts of the translation I have tried to make the context and meaning
more clear. There are also quite a few changes to make it more conformant
with Microsoft's Norwegian Bokmål Style Guide.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Hi, thank you for this major update.</pre>
</blockquote>
<small>Thanks for the feedback.<br>
<br>
The translation easily needed a bit of touchup. Most of the
changes are simply fixing<br>
errors or adding missing strings.<big><br>
<br>
<small>The patch got sent prematurely due to a slip on my part.
I have some more <br>
proofreading to do, and I will do a second consistency pass. I
will do a revised<br>
patch if I come across any errors on my part.<br>
</small></big></small>
<blockquote
cite="mid:41ab4fd5-ed2b-6724-b5f2-20bbc268c9d9@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Regarding quotation marks, it's really up to target language to use one
of several styles of quotation marks and quotation formatting. Original
English text is only a reference, not something to follow.
User guide you mentioned, mostly tells to omit quotation marks (p. 58),
and use straight double quotes if they are necessary.</pre>
</blockquote>
<small>Correct. I've removed quotation marks where I've deemed it to
be for the better.<br>
My main reasoning for going with single over double quotation
marks is purely<br>
aestethics.</small>
<blockquote
cite="mid:41ab4fd5-ed2b-6724-b5f2-20bbc268c9d9@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
The fact that '«' and '»' are missing from default keyboard layout is
unfortunate but can't alone be a reason not to use them, if traditional
typographical rules tell so.
What about default Wine font problems with them? I see no such thing
when testing in clean prefix, but it could certainly depend on dpi/font
size (Wine's Tahoma is simplistic) and actual font you're using.</pre>
</blockquote>
<small><br>
I did put some consideration into which quotation marks to use, as
both conventions<br>
were used. This is the more nitpicky part of my changes, but I am
of the opinion <br>
that the convention I decided to go with looks cleaner and is
easier on the eye. It was<br>
not an <i>issue</i> per se, only aestethics.<br>
</small>
<blockquote
cite="mid:41ab4fd5-ed2b-6724-b5f2-20bbc268c9d9@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Signed-off-by: Kim Malmo <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:berencamlost@msn.com"><berencamlost@msn.com></a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>