<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/26/21 1:21 PM, Mohamad Al-Jaf
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAB2hftJwSbaR36Jvr6guFcT=y1XhfGuy+paz-zj4rGMtYMsZTA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">Hi Nikolay,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Agreed, it does seem like it should not belong to
kernelbase but the function is there in the Windows 10
kernelbase.dll binary.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>As far as I know, these dlls are part of an API set. To me,
it seems much more efficient if there was a way to integrate
them into the core dlls rather than add individual dlls. But I
don't know if this is possible at the moment. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>What do you think? Which dll is more appropriate for these
functions?</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Ideally, we wouldn't be integrating them anywhere. Does it work with
just stub entries in api set dll, without forwards?<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAB2hftJwSbaR36Jvr6guFcT=y1XhfGuy+paz-zj4rGMtYMsZTA@mail.gmail.com"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 4:45
AM Nikolay Sivov <<a href="mailto:nsivov@codeweavers.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">nsivov@codeweavers.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I
don't think this belongs to kernelbase, same for patch 3/4.
Whether we<br>
want internal API at all to accommodate for native dlls is
another question.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>