Move 16-bit COMM stuff to USER, where it belongs

Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry at baikal.ru
Mon Jun 18 06:06:35 CDT 2001


"Patrik Stridvall" <ps at leissner.se> wrote:

> ... perhaps we should call it comm16.c instead of comm.c since
> it seems to only contain 16-bit stuff.

I don't mind. Let it be comm16.c.

> Correct me if I'm wrong but some years(?) ago we discussed
> this a came to the conclusion 16-bit stuff should be in
> seperate files but that it was to much work for little gain
> so no real effort was made. However for new files we really
> should follow this policy.
> 
> PS. No need to supply a new patch. Alexandre can easily rename
> the file and edit the Makefile.in if he agrees.

Sure :-)

Thanks.
--
Dmitry.





More information about the wine-patches mailing list