XML & Kernel Cousin tags in WWN
Francois Gouget
fgouget at free.fr
Sat Jun 7 20:58:56 CDT 2003
I noticed that the header of the WWN XML files were inconsistent.
Some started with:
---
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<kc>
---
others with
---
<kc version="0.1.0">
---
I assume the correct form is:
---
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<kc version="0.1.0">
---
Hence the attached patch. Let me know if I got it wrong.
I also noticed that the following file need to be run through dos2unix:
wn20010611_97.xml
wn20010621_98.xml
wn20010706_99.xml
wn20010718_100.xml
wn20010802_101.xml
Interestingly we don't have an xml file for the WWN editions from 93
to 96.
--
Francois Gouget fgouget at free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/
The greatest programming project of all took six days; on the seventh day the
programmer rested. We've been trying to debug the *&^%$#@ thing ever since.
Moral: design before you implement.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: p20030607-wwn_xml.diff.gz
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 5049 bytes
Desc: p20030607-wwn_xml.diff.gz
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/attachments/20030607/a543ba3c/p20030607-wwn_xml.diff.obj
More information about the wine-patches
mailing list