[WINEHQ] Assorted spelling and duplicates fixes

Francois Gouget fgouget at free.fr
Tue Oct 24 12:37:17 CDT 2006


Changelog:

 * include/html.php
   wwn/wn20000410_38.xml
   wwn/wn20000508_42.xml
   wwn/wn20001113_69.xml
   wwn/wn20010506_94.xml
   wwn/wn20010802_101.xml
   wwn/wn20020129_114.xml
   wwn/wn20020213_115.xml
   wwn/wn20020530_124.xml
   wwn/wn20020927_137.xml
   wwn/wn20030124_154.xml
   wwn/wn20031121_197.xml
   wwn/wn20040514_222.xml
   wwn/wn20040709_230.xml
   wwn/wn20040827_237.xml
   wwn/wn20050325_267.xml
   wwn/wn20050401_268.xml
   wwn/wn20050415_270.xml
   wwn/wn20050506_273.xml
   wwn/wn20050722_284.xml
   wwn/wn20050729_285.xml
   wwn/wn20050805_286.xml
   wwn/wn20051211_301.xml
   wwn/wn20060313_308.xml
   wwn/wn20060810_319.xml
   wwn/interviews/interview_3.xml
   wwn/interviews/interview_8.xml

   Francois Gouget <fgouget at free.fr>
   Assorted spelling and duplicates fixes.

-- 
Francois Gouget <fgouget at free.fr>              http://fgouget.free.fr/
A particle is an irreducible representation of the Poincaré Group - Eugene Wigner
-------------- next part --------------
Index: include/html.php
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/include/html.php,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -r1.16 html.php
--- include/html.php	21 Nov 2005 17:23:15 -0000	1.16
+++ include/html.php	24 Oct 2006 17:30:47 -0000
@@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ class html 
     {
         global $config;
            
-        // orginal in (avoid duplicate replacements)
+        // original in (avoid duplicate replacements)
         $orig = $in;
                 
         // default vars
Index: wwn/wn20000410_38.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20000410_38.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3 wn20000410_38.xml
--- wwn/wn20000410_38.xml	16 Dec 2003 17:09:26 -0000	1.3
+++ wwn/wn20000410_38.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:48 -0000
@@ -87,11 +87,11 @@ Dave Pickles a very long ago reported so
 saving the registry. No one really took care at that time. Two weeks
 ago, Uwe Bonnes experienced the same kind of problems and decided to
 take a look at it. After some tests, he reported some strange
-behavior. G&#233;rard Patel also looked at it and found was was going
+behavior. G&#233;rard Patel also looked at it and found what was going
 wrong: at some point the code sets a request buffer for the server,
 and fills it with different values. Setting up a request buffer
 require to get a buffer (there is one buffer per thread), and then
-write some values in it. The found bug by G&#233;rard lied in the fact that 
+write some values in it. The bug found by G&#233;rard lied in the fact that 
 part of the code writing the values was calling another function,
 which, in turn, was also making a call to the server. This second call 
 was trashing the values already written in the buffer (as there's a
Index: wwn/wn20000508_42.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20000508_42.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 wn20000508_42.xml
--- wwn/wn20000508_42.xml	16 Dec 2003 17:09:26 -0000	1.4
+++ wwn/wn20000508_42.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:48 -0000
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ with the content of the library to load.
 
 The old IsBadReadPtr() code returned true in this situation, while the 
 new code returns false (the addresses and the relay output is identical 
-up to this point). Most intersting is the fact, that the
+up to this point). Most interesting is the fact, that the
 VirtualAlloc() call in PE_LoadImage() fails, _if_ IsBadReadPtr() has
 been called before. As a result, COMCTL32 will be relocated to another 
 address and not shared, when it is loaded a second time later by the
Index: wwn/wn20001113_69.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20001113_69.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3 wn20001113_69.xml
--- wwn/wn20001113_69.xml	16 Dec 2003 17:09:27 -0000	1.3
+++ wwn/wn20001113_69.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:48 -0000
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ FindWindow and SendMessage) have to work
 completely (the installer was not terminating correctly and was
 leaving apps running). If yes, having this fixed seems mandatory for
 the legendary 1.0 bottled Wine since InstallShield working perfectly
-is included in the official spec; however, I am not sure if IS is
+is included in the official spec; however, I am not sure if InstallShield is
 working perfectly now - I think not but there are other points of view
 :-).</li>
 </ol>
Index: wwn/wn20010506_94.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20010506_94.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12 wn20010506_94.xml
--- wwn/wn20010506_94.xml	28 Oct 2005 16:05:10 -0000	1.12
+++ wwn/wn20010506_94.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:48 -0000
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ following dilemna:</p>
 
 <quote who="Ian Pilcher"><p>
    In order to Unicode-enable the PostScript driver, it needs information
-   about about font encodings that isn't present in Adobe's AFM file
+   about font encodings that isn't present in Adobe's AFM file
    format (glyph names for character encodings greater than 256).  For
    Type 1 fonts with a standard encoding, the driver can use the encoding
    in the Adobe Glyph List.  (There's no other choice.)</p>
Index: wwn/wn20010802_101.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20010802_101.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 wn20010802_101.xml
--- wwn/wn20010802_101.xml	20 Jun 2005 16:21:07 -0000	1.7
+++ wwn/wn20010802_101.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:48 -0000
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ changes:</p>
 <p>Patrik wondered, <quote who="Patrik Stridvall">
 
 		You want all 16-bit exported function prototypes moved from the .h
-		files to the implementing .c file in all cases that is is possible (ie Wine
+		files to the implementing .c file in all cases that is possible (ie Wine
 		compiles without errors or warnings)?</quote>
 
 Alexandre said that was exactly what he wanted, <quote who="Alexandre Julliard">
Index: wwn/wn20020129_114.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20020129_114.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 wn20020129_114.xml
--- wwn/wn20020129_114.xml	16 Dec 2003 17:09:27 -0000	1.6
+++ wwn/wn20020129_114.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:48 -0000
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ patch to improve Office functionality.  
 asked for volunteers.  Duane Clark, Huw Davies, and Dimitrie Paun responded and broke it
 up into 30+ patches.  Alexandre also committed a patch from Huw Davies that uses the 
 Xrender extension to support client side font rendering - thereby providing anti-aliased 
-text.  Mike McCormack also came up with a patch that to remove X borders and and title
+text.  Mike McCormack also came up with a patch that to remove X borders and title
 bars on managed windows, so the Windows are still managed and they look like a normal 
 Windows window.</p>
 
Index: wwn/wn20020213_115.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20020213_115.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.10 wn20020213_115.xml
--- wwn/wn20020213_115.xml	20 Jun 2005 16:21:07 -0000	1.10
+++ wwn/wn20020213_115.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:49 -0000
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ to somewhat interesting.  Jeremy wrote:<
 	 offered to help review licensing strategies for Wine.  The goal is to
 	 attempt to secure some form of Copyleft protection for Wine while
 	 still permitting proprietary software to link and bind with Wine.  I
-	 think it it is great that we have, in Eben, not only the leading legal
+	 think it is great that we have, in Eben, not only the leading legal
 	 scholar on free software licensing, but a great hacker to boot.  I
 	 think he will clarify exactly what is possible and what is not
 	 possible with GPL style licenses and insure that the license we choose
Index: wwn/wn20020530_124.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20020530_124.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.8 wn20020530_124.xml
--- wwn/wn20020530_124.xml	20 Jun 2005 16:21:07 -0000	1.8
+++ wwn/wn20020530_124.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:49 -0000
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ applys to both the Mingw on Cygwin and M
 This document assumes you are using cygwin to configure and build WINE for 
 a Mingw Target. Cygwin is environment used due to a set of bugs within the 
 Mingw Unix Environment MSYS. Msys may work however it, the ReactOS build 
-system and and any other configurations are not supported by the WINE project.
+system and any other configurations are not supported by the WINE project.
 <ol>
  <li> Make sure you have the latest cygwin with win32api package.</li>
  <li> Be sure you are using mingw-extra-2.95.3.tar.gz with cygwin. (Fix for some libiberty.a issues) 
Index: wwn/wn20020927_137.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20020927_137.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 wn20020927_137.xml
--- wwn/wn20020927_137.xml	16 Dec 2003 17:09:27 -0000	1.4
+++ wwn/wn20020927_137.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:49 -0000
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ on <a href="http://www.winehq.org">WineH
 </p><p>
  I need all current developers to send me their info for this page. It is
  optional to be listed here of course. If you are on the list now and do
- not wish be be listed let me know. I'll also take anyone's suggestions
+ not wish to be listed, let me know. I'll also take anyone's suggestions
  on how to improve this page.
 </p><p>
  Optional info I'd like from everyone.
Index: wwn/wn20030124_154.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20030124_154.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.9 wn20030124_154.xml
--- wwn/wn20030124_154.xml	16 Dec 2004 23:00:57 -0000	1.9
+++ wwn/wn20030124_154.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:49 -0000
@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ and possibly vice-versa (!).</quote></p>
 >
 <topic>Utilities</topic>
 <p>Dan Kegel, in his quest to make Microsoft's Visual C++ v4
-work, put together some info on it and and asked about adding
+work, put together some info on it and asked about adding
 a new tool:</p>
 <quote who="Dan Kegel"><p>
 
Index: wwn/wn20031121_197.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20031121_197.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.8 wn20031121_197.xml
--- wwn/wn20031121_197.xml	25 Oct 2005 19:23:16 -0000	1.8
+++ wwn/wn20031121_197.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:50 -0000
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ you can submit patches to merge them bac
 
 <p>Dmitry Timoshkov found a description of how the licenses interrelate:</p>
 <quote who="Dmitry Timoshkov"><p>
-Anyway, were is a snippet of the LICENSE file at the root of the WineX
+Anyway, here is a snippet of the LICENSE file at the root of the WineX
 tree:
 </p><p>
 "Source code and other software components explicitly identified as 
Index: wwn/wn20040514_222.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20040514_222.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 wn20040514_222.xml
--- wwn/wn20040514_222.xml	4 Jan 2005 19:49:24 -0000	1.6
+++ wwn/wn20040514_222.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:50 -0000
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ allows free usage for non-comercial work
 and see if changing compilers would yield better performance. According
 to Intel's site it is supposed to give a 15 to 30% speed boost in
 applications. I was able to compile WINE with only about a 10 line
-patch. Somehow some of of the inline asm is already getting defined by
+patch. Somehow some of the inline asm is already getting defined by
 icc. I am having some problems running graphical applications and maybe
 it is related to the code I had to disable. If anyone else wants to
 test I figure this might be a good tool to have if you are porting a
Index: wwn/wn20040709_230.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20040709_230.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3 wn20040709_230.xml
--- wwn/wn20040709_230.xml	10 Oct 2006 20:06:19 -0000	1.3
+++ wwn/wn20040709_230.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:50 -0000
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ Winelib application that is GPL or if I 
 Adavapi32 code in to ReactOS this presents a problem. Am I correct in
 reading it this way?
 </p><p>
-If I am correct and it is incompatible with with GPL then would any of
+If I am correct and it is incompatible with GPL then would any of
 the Wine developers object to changing out crypto implementation to use
 NSS from Mozilla? I have spoken with the developers of Network Security
 Services for Mozilla and it has recently been tri-licensed MPL/LGPL/GPL
Index: wwn/wn20040827_237.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20040827_237.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 wn20040827_237.xml
--- wwn/wn20040827_237.xml	10 Oct 2006 20:06:19 -0000	1.4
+++ wwn/wn20040827_237.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:51 -0000
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ wrappers to deal with the namespace prob
 that with a suitable naming convention as we began to do with the 
 winegcc patch.
 </p><p>
-Alternatively we could go with with dynamic binding as proposed by 
+Alternatively we could go with dynamic binding as proposed by 
 Alexandre and have a syscall (or emulation escape) to call PPC code. 
 This is probably the easiest to implement but leaves us with extra call 
 overhead (although apparently this is something that is currently done 
Index: wwn/wn20050325_267.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20050325_267.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 wn20050325_267.xml
--- wwn/wn20050325_267.xml	26 Oct 2005 20:25:59 -0000	1.5
+++ wwn/wn20050325_267.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:51 -0000
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ enough to get this into Wine.  However, 
 as a starting point for someone else.  Rick Romero
 took a look at it and fixed some problems:</p>
 <quote who="Rick Romero"><p>
-That code doesn't with with my QuickCam 3000, which defaults to YUV420.
+That code doesn't with my QuickCam 3000, which defaults to YUV420.
 </p><p>
 The 
 <a href="http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2005/03/att-0901/01-vidcat.patch__charset_ISO-8859-1">attached 
Index: wwn/wn20050401_268.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20050401_268.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 wn20050401_268.xml
--- wwn/wn20050401_268.xml	13 Apr 2005 21:55:51 -0000	1.5
+++ wwn/wn20050401_268.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:52 -0000
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ The biggest news of the week is the rele
 4.2.  CodeWeavers 
 <a href="http://crossover.codeweavers.com/pipermail/announce/2005-March/000029.html">announced 4.2</a> on Wednesday.  The 
 <a href="http://www.codeweavers.com/about/general/press/?id=20050330">press
-release</a> goes into detail about about some of the new features,
+release</a> goes into detail about some of the new features,
 or you can read the short version in the 
 <a href="http://www.codeweavers.com/site/products/cxoffice/change_log">ChangeLog</a>.  
 Some excerpts from Jeremy White's announcement:</p>
Index: wwn/wn20050415_270.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20050415_270.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 wn20050415_270.xml
--- wwn/wn20050415_270.xml	19 Apr 2005 14:24:05 -0000	1.2
+++ wwn/wn20050415_270.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:52 -0000
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ least enumerate. Talking to the devices 
 windows programs will talk to the devices by using something like libusb. So
 either something like ndiswrapper for USB would be needed in the kernel to
 load windows drivers, with infrastructure in wine to to talk to the driver,
-or the windows driver need to be be reengineered to expose an API to the
+or the windows driver need to be reengineered to expose an API to the
 user program like with windows driver, but internally use Linux means
 (libusb, etc).
 </p><p>
Index: wwn/wn20050506_273.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20050506_273.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 wn20050506_273.xml
--- wwn/wn20050506_273.xml	20 May 2005 17:58:37 -0000	1.2
+++ wwn/wn20050506_273.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:52 -0000
@@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ Here's just a sample of the results from
 <tr><td>Graphics Memory - 64 Lines </td><td> 1249.365 fps</td><td>250.577</td></tr></table></p>
 
 <p>Notice anything strange?  I picked those results out only because I
-thought it was was interesting Wine performed better than Windows.  As
+thought it was interesting Wine performed better than Windows.  As
 Tom cautioned:</p>
 <quote who="Tom Wickline"><p>
 Before you put any merit into any of my results I would highly
Index: wwn/wn20050722_284.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20050722_284.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 wn20050722_284.xml
--- wwn/wn20050722_284.xml	10 Aug 2005 15:33:11 -0000	1.4
+++ wwn/wn20050722_284.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:52 -0000
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ and have a party!
 <p>That long string of patches mentioned by Jeremy hit wine-patches
 at almost the exact same time as the announcement.  It consisted of
 16 patches touching on all sorts of DCOM stuff way over my head and
-using words like <i>marshal</i> and <i>ITypeInfo</i>.  For for those
+using words like <i>marshal</i> and <i>ITypeInfo</i>.  For those
 of you just tuning in, this seems to be the culmination of about nine
 months of work.  Last November a big push began to overhaul DCOM with
 a lot of major changes.  In reality, DCOM issues have been plaguing 
Index: wwn/wn20050729_285.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20050729_285.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 wn20050729_285.xml
--- wwn/wn20050729_285.xml	10 Aug 2005 15:32:33 -0000	1.2
+++ wwn/wn20050729_285.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:52 -0000
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ cd /usr/src/wine<br />
 </code></ul></p><p>
 Note there is no support for arm in Wineserver, kernel32 or ntdll so winelib 
 won't run yet. Most everything else should compile as Winelib works on i386, 
-PPC and SPARC. You might be able to get by by stubbing the set_thread_context 
+PPC and SPARC. You might be able to get by, by stubbing the set_thread_context 
 stuff out for simple apps.</p></quote>
 
 <p>We sort of touched on this subject last winter in WWN
Index: wwn/wn20050805_286.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20050805_286.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 wn20050805_286.xml
--- wwn/wn20050805_286.xml	15 Aug 2005 18:19:06 -0000	1.4
+++ wwn/wn20050805_286.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:53 -0000
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ on <a href="http://www.xyzcomputing.com/
 Using this tool I was able to install a number of Windows programs that I have 
 stored on my C: in their executable form. Again, this may seem like the type 
 of thing that a long-time Linux user would scoff at but if you are trying to 
-move to Linux in a a gradual manner or you just happen to be attached to 
+move to Linux in a gradual manner or you just happen to be attached to 
 certain programs, tools like this can prove invaluable. This process could be 
 done in just a few clicks but took a good deal longer than a standard Windows 
 installation due to the internal adjustments that must be made.</p></quote>
Index: wwn/wn20051211_301.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20051211_301.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 wn20051211_301.xml
--- wwn/wn20051211_301.xml	3 Jan 2006 22:02:04 -0000	1.4
+++ wwn/wn20051211_301.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:53 -0000
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ workaround with imake has become unneede
 out-of-the-box and finds X11 libraries.
 </p><p>
 I'm posting the script here in hope that it will be useful for some Wine
-users.  I'm not sure it it merits inclusion in Wine, but I would not
+users.  I'm not sure it merits inclusion in Wine, but I would not
 object.
 </p></quote>
 
Index: wwn/wn20060313_308.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20060313_308.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3 wn20060313_308.xml
--- wwn/wn20060313_308.xml	30 Mar 2006 21:39:05 -0000	1.3
+++ wwn/wn20060313_308.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:54 -0000
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ So what's basically needed for DDraw ove
 <p>Finally, Stefan wondered about a refcounting problem and sent a
 long email describing what he ran into along with a possible workaround:</p>
 <quote who="Stefan Dosinger"><p>
-I have a a question regarding some code that might be rejected by Alexandre 
+I have a question regarding some code that might be rejected by Alexandre 
 when I submit it. The problem is that I have to do a refcount hack in my new 
 ddraw code to destroy textures properly. I CC this mail to AJ because it's 
 him who has the last word ;)
Index: wwn/wn20060810_319.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/wn20060810_319.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 wn20060810_319.xml
--- wwn/wn20060810_319.xml	14 Aug 2006 15:46:58 -0000	1.2
+++ wwn/wn20060810_319.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:54 -0000
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ rate sucks, and that's $75 US, but still
 If you <i>don't</i> get me a room request in the next few days, then I'll
 have to close down our room reservation, and you'll be stuck
 in some sleazy motel on the edge of town paying outrageous
-sums of of money.  (Okay, they actually all look like nice places
+sums of money.  (Okay, they actually all look like nice places
 to stay, but they will be a ways away, and they all cost more :-/).
 </p><p>
 Again, see this page for more details:
Index: wwn/interviews/interview_3.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/interviews/interview_3.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 interview_3.xml
--- wwn/interviews/interview_3.xml	4 Sep 2003 15:53:37 -0000	1.5
+++ wwn/interviews/interview_3.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:54 -0000
@@ -172,8 +172,8 @@ The core interfaces are:
 There are predefined interfaces from Microsoft which have a well defined
 API, or you can have other interfaces of your own with their own IIDs.
 </p><p>
-As for interface access this is was always on compile time. As for object
-creation and interface access was possible for runtime.
+As for interface access, this was always at compile time. As for object
+creation and interface, access was possible for runtime.
 </p><p>
 This was all in-process up to then.
 </p><p>
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ of Windows, which is, well, not really d
   done?</p></question>
 
 <answer><p><i>Marcus:</i>
- At the time I did it it was 99% repetition.</p></answer>
+ At the time I did it, it was 99% repetition.</p></answer>
 
 <question><p><i>BV:</i>
  How is their implementation different?
Index: wwn/interviews/interview_8.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/wwn/interviews/interview_8.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 interview_8.xml
--- wwn/interviews/interview_8.xml	4 Sep 2003 15:53:37 -0000	1.2
+++ wwn/interviews/interview_8.xml	24 Oct 2006 17:30:54 -0000
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ I never figured out how to work with win
 </p><p>
  This means that Wine's field of applicability will remain limited to 
  Win95-style end user applications, because Wine's security capabilities
- are similar to those of Win95. That's not too bad because this is was
+ are similar to those of Win95. That's not too bad because this is what
  Wine was made for, and what most people want. Problems may only arise if
  future Windows end user software developed on Win2k, XP and successors
  becomes more aware of these Windows features and uses them more


More information about the wine-patches mailing list