A philosophical question on the Windows Shell.
Andreas Mohr Usenet 08/01
vooe7o001 at sneakemail.com
Tue Aug 7 14:03:08 CDT 2001
Uwe Bonnes <bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
> The Ghost In The Machine <ewill at lexideb.athghost7038suus.net> wrote:
> : OK, very dumb question here, which may not be relevant to this
> : Anthony's, but:
> : Would there be a problem in running a task which gives one "the
> : Windows environment"? I've no idea what the official name is in Win2k,
> : but the Shell seems to be the term used, and in any event something
> : has to maintain the background. Most likely it's an IE offshoot...
> There is no fundamental problem. The windows shell is "explorer.exe",
> linking deep into undocumented functions and into IE on recent versions.
> So technical problems are big.
Well, but there are still free Explorer replacements left for fiddling...
(sorry, I can't remember the name of that big project for the life of me)
> : It's possible no one would want to anyway, but I occasionally
> : get the feeling I'm "rebooting" Windows every time I run Wine;
> : it's setting up, running the program, and then tearing down
> : when the program exits. Perhaps part of this can be helped
> : via Wineserver, but I do wonder.
> Startup of wineserver takes some time. So keep a windows process running,
> and another invocation of a windows programm via wine will use the running
Well, yeah, but better use wineserver -p.
Andreas Mohr, Renningen, Germany
In case you need to contact me after expiry of temporary email address:
my real address is (initial of first name).(last name)@mailto.de
More information about the wine-users