[Wine]reply should be to: wine-users@winehq.org not author

[Brad Fuller]

M-Halo wrote:

>--- "James E. LaBarre" <jamesl at bestweb.net> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>>On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 08:27 -0800, Duane Clark
>>>      
>>>
>>wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>>(You need to hit "Reply-all" so that responses go
>>>>        
>>>>
>>to the list, instead 
>>    
>>
>>>>of just to me.)
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Sorry, The Fedora list mail comes "from" the list,
>>>      
>>>
>>so I never check the
>>    
>>
>>>to in the reply.
>>>      
>>>
>>I just wish you folks would stop whining when you
>>get a message that should
>>have gone to the list.  As long as the list insists
>>upon varying from
>>*expected* behavior (regardless on whether or not
>>it's correct), you must
>>expect to get misdirected messages.
>>    
>>
>
>No whining.  Sometimes people forget, and you have to
>remind them about this or send the message back to the
>alias.  Personally, unless the conversation leads to
>something offline (from the alias), I prefer to keep
>the message in the alias' eyes.
>  
>
Why does this mailing list do that? Can't it be configured like most 
other lists for reply to: wine-users at winehq.org

I often forget to look at the To: to see who it's going to --- I just 
assume that when I hit "reply" the msg will go back to the list (as it 
should.  it is a "distribution list" after all)

brad

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20041206/5ba5f9e9/attachment.html