[Wine]Setting reply-to list

[eternal]

in all fairness...  lets remember that this is a WINE list, and not a
gripe-about-email-crap list.

i motion that the wine list admin read those links, and make up his/her
own mind, and we never have to hear about it again.  -=o)

i hope i didnt step on any toes here, but i, as a list subscriber, would
most want my list to be *on topic*, and that means wine.  not whine.

shaun

On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 09:16, James E. LaBarre wrote:
> > Hmm, I think a short intro as to why Reply-To list is not set by default 
> > is in order. From my experience in the past, this option causes more 
> > pain than joy, and is generally a bad move. I'll also mention that 
> > people who request this option almost always are the same people who 
> > don't set up a mail filter to file mailing list messages into a 
> > different folder.
> > 
> > This is a summary of "http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html"
> 
> 
> Ah yes, people *love* to trumpet out that rant every chance they get. 
> I'll see you that rant and raise you one reply at
> http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml