[Wine] winetools and ie6
Alan McKinnon
alan at linuxholdings.co.za
Wed Oct 11 02:10:24 CDT 2006
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 08:20, Bry Melvin wrote:
> Guess I'll probably get flamed now, but my software testing has put
> wine+winetools as more functional than wine or Crossover. At least
> from a point of view of someone wanting to do Graphics production and
> migrating from Win or OS/2 to Linux (and work predominately from a
> GUI).
Ah, you have specific needs. That changes everything.
The wine/winetools debate has been going on for ages. Here's the
summary:
Wine is a project still in alpha. The devs want people to use wine
itself and figure out where the bugs are. Winetools and even ies4linux
are stop-gap measures to get around areas where wine is still not fully
functional. The devs also want to receive traffic on how wine
works/doesn't work, they don't want to have to handle traffic on
winetools and the stuff it does. Winetools and ies4linus don't do
anything unusual that the wine devs need to investigate - all they do
is register heaps of native overrides where a wine lib is replaced by a
real windows one nicked off a windows machine. Wine devs giving support
on this list to winetools users is coutner-productive to the devs time
as they (mostly) don't get paid for what they do. The goal is to get
all Win32 functions correctly implemented in wine, not concentrate on
the stop-gap measures.
This all blew up a few months back and is documented somewhere. The
eventual agreement was that the wine web page would retain the existing
link to winetools with disclaimers that it was unsupported by the wine
devs, and the recommendation was for wine user to use wine and help get
the bugs out. Winetools is of course free to build on top of wine and
build it's own support community for those users where raw wine is
still too rough a solution to be realistic.
So your readers are regular users. For them to get IE running *right now
today*, they will get best results from Crossover or ies4linux. To get
Office running, Crossover is easily the better solution. winetools may
suit them better for other well known apps. In any event, they won't
find much support for any of those solution on this list (whose purpose
is to get wine itself debugged and working better).
Reality check: Someday wine on it's own will be sufficient for Regular
User Joe, but that day hasn't arrived yet.
Hope this help clear up things a bit
alan
More information about the wine-users
mailing list