[Wine] Bugzilla comment

[James Mckenzie]

Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> at Oct 21, 2008 8:16 AM wrote about Re: [Wine] Bugzilla comment
>
>On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:01 AM, stimpak <wineforum-user at winehq.org> wrote:
>> too many UNCO bugs are listed for wine < 1.0 . I suggest purging or archiving the really old ones since they must have been fixed   or no-one cares for them atm. Either way they're too confusing!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Many of them are still valid. I am going through inactive ones to
>verify they still exist, and closing non responsive ones.
>
>I put in a request for volunteers last week. If you've got
>time/bandwith to spare, you can help by testing these old bugs:
>http://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?t=2565
>
>In short:
>Upgrade to git/wine 1.1.6.
>Look at these bugs:
>http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Wine&keywords=download&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=days_elapsed&type0-0-0=greaterthan&value0-0-0=180
>Test in a clean WINEPREFIX.
>Leave a note in the bug about it. Fixed/still present/blocked by other
>bug/busted download link/etc.

Austin:

Would you also like confirmation/denial on Darwine or would you rather these be confirmed only on Linux?

James McKenzie