[Wine] Re: Native libpq.so instead of libpq.dll?

[Cigydd]

vitamin wrote:
> 
> Cigydd wrote:
> > but WINE doesn't convert, manage or synchronize anything - 
> 
> Wrong, that is the major part of Wine's functionality.

OK, so then what's the principial difference?


vitamin wrote:
> 
> Cigydd wrote:
> > it[Wine] just implements what the Win32 applications are trying to call, so the whole Win32 API…?
> 
> Yup, pretty much. Since there are no such things as DirectX for Linux Wine must implement that from the scratch.

Yes, absolutely.

--Cigydd