Example of what I'm seeing here: <a href="http://img517.imageshack.us/my.php?image=winefontbug5oq.jpg">http://img517.imageshack.us/my.php?image=winefontbug5oq.jpg</a><br><div><span class="gmail_quote"><br>On 6/23/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">
Daniel Skorka</b> <<a href="mailto:daniel.skorka@stud.uni-karlsruhe.de">daniel.skorka@stud.uni-karlsruhe.de</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Please keep this on the list.<br><br>> I know that a CVS version doesn't necessary represent a fully-functional<br>> version. I just wanted to see if my experience was the bug 5057 that was<br>> already reported (Core fonts don't install if they're found on the
<br>> host<<a href="http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5057">http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5057</a>>)<br>> or if it was something new.<br><br>I don't think you are seeing bug #5057.</blockquote><div>
<br>I think you're right. I don't have any packages containing the MS fonts.<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">> I have fontforge installed by RPM. configure (actually tools/wineinstall)
<br>> did warn me about fontforge. On my first attempt, I didn't have it<br>> installed at all. Now, I see confusing version information reported by rpm<br>> ...<br>><br>> Version : 0.0<br>> Release :
0.cvs20050502.2.el4.rf<br>> Vendor : Dries RPM Repository <a href="http://dries.ulyssis.org/rpm/">http://dries.ulyssis.org/rpm/</a><br>> Build Date : Mon 11 Jul 2005 02:33:09 PM MYT<br>><br>> So I guess that the packager downloaded fontforge from CVS and built the
<br>> RPM. Is this a problem?<br><br>That is not a problem. But your version may be too old. At least your<br>problem is exactly what happens if your version of fontforge is too old.</blockquote><div><br>I've just downloaded and installed the latest RPM available from
<a href="http://fontforge.sourceforge.net">fontforge.sourceforge.net</a> and I can still reproduce the problem. <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Daniel<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>wine-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:wine-users@winehq.org">wine-users@winehq.org</a><br><a href="http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users">http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>The creator of bug #5057 reports that the problem occurs because
he has a package installed that already includes the MS fonts. It's an
unconfirmed bug. I don't have any package including these fonts, but
my "C:\Windows\Fonts" directory is still empty. I think I may be
experiencing the same issue, but it's not because the fonts are found
on the host.<br><br>What do you think?<br><br>Thank you for your help.<br><br>-- Vince<br>