Dan Kegel wrote: > Hey, as long as we're on touchy subjects, how about using > bitkeeper? Oh, wait, Alexandre nixed that a long time > ago, according to > http://www.kerneltraffic.org/wine/wn20000515_43_print.html#2 > Nevermind. Interesting, I have never seen that list from Alexandre before. We're very close to the original goals set out for 1.0, let alone 0.9!